There was an unexpected compliment for Saxon on Thursday in an announcement of a new release of Per Bothner's Qexo implementation of XQuery. He slipped in the remark: "some tests are significantly faster than Saxon". More evidence that our competitors regard Saxon as the product they need to beat, and at the same time an admission that for most tests, Saxon runs faster than this particular engine. Since most developers (including me) can usually get their own product to run faster than anyone else can, that's a nice testimonial.
It's impressive though that Per is running all 16000 XQTS tests in 75 seconds. It takes me a lot longer, but I don't separate the time spent running the query from the time spent parsing and canonicalizing the actual results and reference results, and then comparing them. I must find out what Per is actually measuring. I should also follow Qexo's lead in publishing my test driver: at present it needs a bit of packaging work to make it run anywhere other than my own laptop.
|
|
||||||||
|
Login
|
Unexpected flattery
Comments
Re: question
by
Howie D
on Fri 02 Mar 2007 18:22 GMT | Profile | Permanent Link
What format are files created in that use the Saxon processor. Is it DOS?
I just started working at my current job. They are using the Saxon stuff to create report text files. When I open the output files in UltraEdit, Ultraedit ask me if I want to convert the file to DOS format. And when I open the files in notepad, the data doesn't appear in nice columns like Ultraedit. They appear not to be formatted correctly. The file has the line feed at the end of each record. My email at work is hdunstan@blockvision.com. |
Search
Recent Comments
Month Archive
|
||||||